Safety and effectiveness of three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
نویسندگان
چکیده
UNLABELLED Most commonly performed laparoscopic surgery is laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Although cholecystectomy through three port is not commonly preferred, researches have shown that it is a safe and feasible way of surgery. Material and Methods. We evaluate 100 patient that have undergone elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy through three port (group one). These patients were compared with 50 patients that have undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy through four port (group two). Complications, lenght of stay in hospital, operation time, conversion to open surgery rate were compared in two group. RESULTS In group one, fourth port was necessary for nine (9%) patients. Duration of operation in group one was in average 31 min and in group two, 31, 3 min. Operation time, lenght of stay in hospital, complication rate, conversion to open surgery rate was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION Three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safer method when performed by experienced surgeons. Laparoscopic cholecyctectomy can be tried through three ports firstly and can be continued with addition of fourth port if necessary.
منابع مشابه
A Review of Randomized Controlled Trials comparing Single Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Aim: To determine the safety and benefits of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Materials and methods: A search for randomized controlled trials comparing single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy was conducted using Google scholar, HighPress and SCOPUS. Results: Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy has a longer operating time, with equiv...
متن کاملA safe and inexpensive technique of retrieval of gallbladder specimen after laparoscopy
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with greater chances of intra abdominal stone spillage and implantation and port site contamination when gallbladder specimen is retrieved without endobag. Economical sterile surgical gloves can be used instead of expensive commercial endobags to retrieve the gallbladder specimen and also intra abdominal spilled stones safely without complications. Eva...
متن کاملThree Port Versus Standard Four Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy- A Prospective Study
The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was performed in 1987 by Philip Mouret and later established by Dubois, Perissat, Reddick, and others in 1990's (1-3). Since then, there have been many changes and improvements in the technique. Traditional LC is performed using 4 port technique. The fourth (lateral) trocar is used to grasp the fundus of the gall bladder so as to expose the Calot's tr...
متن کاملLaparoscopic Cholecystectomy; closure versus non-closure of the fascial sheath opening of the sub-umbilical port site “10 mm”.
Background: Laparoscopic Surgery (LS) may be associated with many port site complications such as hernia, bleeding, infection, subcutaneous emphysema and ugly scars. Some of these complications are serious such as obstructed port site hernia . Rate of these complications is low depending on size and site of the port incision, type of the trocar that it is used, the condition of the patient a...
متن کاملSingle-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: a retrospective comparison with 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
OBJECTIVES To report our experience with single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for cholecystectomy and to perform a retrospective comparison with conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS Data were prospectively collected for all patients undergoing SILS for cholecystectomy at St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, England (n = 41 p...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- International journal of clinical and experimental medicine
دوره 7 8 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014